TV Book Club: The Little Stranger

Tonight, More4 broadcast the first episode of The TV Book Club, the successor to the Richard & Judy Book Club, but extended to half an hour and presented by a panel of five celebrities (Jo Brand, Nathaniel Parker, Laila Rouass, Dave Spikey and Gok Wan). I never paid much attention in the R&J days, but watched this partly out of curiosity, and partly because I already knew the book under discussion, Sarah Waters’ The Little Stranger (my review of that book is here). And I’m left with one main thought: is that it?

Each week, we were told at the beginning, the panel would be joined by a guest who would take part in the discussion and also talk about their own book. This week’s guest was Chris Evans, who was interviewed about his autobioraphy for most of the first half. This actually ended up being the most in-depth item on the whole programme; but,. as I’m not terribly interested in celebrity autobiographies, I couldn’t muster up much enthusiasm for it.

After the Evans segment, the show blew its own trumpet with a short item on the author Cecelia Ahern, and how her career was transformed by being chosen for the Book Club back in 2004. And that was the end of part one.

Part two arrived, and were we now going to talk about the week’s choice? No, we weren’t. Instead, we had a filmed item in which the comedian Mark Watson asked people if they knew what various obscure words meant. (This was in relation to a recently-published book called The Completely Superior Person’s Book of Words by Peter Bowler.) Watson was, as ever, entertaining; and, at least, this was telling me about a book of which I was unlikely to have heard. But, still, this item was essentially a makeweight in a programme that really needed more substance.

And, finally, we made it to The Little Stranger. First, a short interview in which Waters talked about the book; then the actual discussion, which lasted less than five minutes. In a half-hour show. How disappointing.

So, the first episode of The TV Book Club was unsatisfactory on just about all counts. It didn’t succeed as a book club, because barely five minutes in total were devoted to the chosen book. It didn’t succeed as a magazine programme about books, because it didn’t cover enough new/unfamiliar books, or talk about its subjects in any real depth. We don’t have that many TV shows about books in the UK as it is — but new ones really need to be better than this.


  1. I felt much the same as you. Too little depth to anything, and the atmosphere was very flat. Felt very scripted too – I’d far rather half a full half of the programme dedicated to the book of the week, with a reading from it, the thoughts of the panel followed by an open discussion. High calibre guests but I didn’t get any sort of feel for their reading tastes.

  2. Totally agree. I only watched the last half and thought it was rubbish.

  3. it was very poor david won t be turning over to watch it again ,enjoyed little stranger when i read it but won t have picked it up after there mumblings about it

  4. Agree wholeheartedly David, we mirror a lot of your thoughts on our blog and just hope the programme makers are listening!

  5. David Hebblethwaite

    18th January 2010 at 10:02 am

    Thanks very much for the comments, everyone. It’s interesting to see that the comments on the Channel 4 website are also generally negative; I wonder if they will change the format.

  6. I am in the US so I didn’t see this but there are quite a few commentaries popping up in the book blogosphere. had a very similar reaction. Liked you said, maybe they are listening.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2024 David's Book World

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑